nanogui: Cleaning up the source trees


Previous by date: 29 Sep 1999 17:54:04 -0000 Re: State of the nanogui union?, Greg Haerr
Next by date: 29 Sep 1999 17:54:04 -0000 Re: NanoGUI palette model, Bradley D. LaRonde
Previous in thread: 29 Sep 1999 17:54:04 -0000 Re: Cleaning up the source trees, Greg Haerr
Next in thread: 29 Sep 1999 17:54:04 -0000 Re: Cleaning up the source trees, Alex Holden

Subject: Re: Cleaning up the source trees
From: Alex Holden ####@####.####
Date: 29 Sep 1999 17:54:04 -0000
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.04.9909291836540.387-100000@hyperspace>

On Wed, 29 Sep 1999, Bradley D. LaRonde wrote:
> > I think the directory tree I came up with achieves that using more
> > understandable names 
> If there is a valid need for 8.3, then why not support it?

I did support it, but using more understandable names...

> I like that idea.  However... aren't we going to have to modify bogl
> eventually anyway?

I don't know, I prefer the idea of improving bogl, but keeping it as a
seperate library rather than having to back-port the changes whenever Ben
improves the base Bogl library.

--------------- Linux- the choice of a GNU generation. --------------
: Alex Holden (M1CJD)- Caver, Programmer, Land Rover nut, Radio Ham :
-------------------- http://www.linuxhacker.org/ --------------------


Previous by date: 29 Sep 1999 17:54:04 -0000 Re: State of the nanogui union?, Greg Haerr
Next by date: 29 Sep 1999 17:54:04 -0000 Re: NanoGUI palette model, Bradley D. LaRonde
Previous in thread: 29 Sep 1999 17:54:04 -0000 Re: Cleaning up the source trees, Greg Haerr
Next in thread: 29 Sep 1999 17:54:04 -0000 Re: Cleaning up the source trees, Alex Holden


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.