nanogui: Licensing


Previous by date: 11 May 1999 09:10:53 -0000 Re: NanoX version 0.3 released, Alex Holden
Next by date: 11 May 1999 09:10:53 -0000 Re: NanoX version 0.3 released, Alexander Peuchert
Previous in thread: 11 May 1999 09:10:53 -0000 Re: Licensing, Alexander Peuchert
Next in thread: 11 May 1999 09:10:53 -0000 Re: Licensing, Alexander Peuchert

Subject: Re: Re[2]: Licensing
From: Alex Holden ####@####.####
Date: 11 May 1999 09:10:53 -0000
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.04.9905111006150.11663-100000@www.linuxhacker.org>

On Tue, 11 May 1999, Alexander Peuchert wrote:
> As long as feedback for the sources is garanteed, the licensing model
> doesn't matter, in my oppinion.

The point is that with something like FreeBSD style, it _isn't_
guaranteed. It's perfectly acceptable for a company to take the code,
improve it, sell it, and not give out the improvements. I'm happy with
this for Nano-X itself (but not the programs and things which run on it),
but I don't think Greg is. I don't think it's legal to take David Bell's
code and GPL it without his permission though, but I could be wrong.

--------------- Linux- the choice of a GNU generation. --------------
: Alex Holden (M1CJD)- Caver, Programmer, Land Rover nut, Radio Ham :
-------------------- http://www.linuxhacker.org/ --------------------


Previous by date: 11 May 1999 09:10:53 -0000 Re: NanoX version 0.3 released, Alex Holden
Next by date: 11 May 1999 09:10:53 -0000 Re: NanoX version 0.3 released, Alexander Peuchert
Previous in thread: 11 May 1999 09:10:53 -0000 Re: Licensing, Alexander Peuchert
Next in thread: 11 May 1999 09:10:53 -0000 Re: Licensing, Alexander Peuchert


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.