nanogui: nano-X is real X server?


Previous by date: 12 Jul 2006 04:09:14 +0100 Re: nano-X is real X server?, Aaron J. Grier
Next by date: 12 Jul 2006 04:09:14 +0100 Image size limit?, Martin Kajdas
Previous in thread: 12 Jul 2006 04:09:14 +0100 Re: nano-X is real X server?, Aaron J. Grier
Next in thread:

Subject: Re: [nanogui] Re: nano-X is real X server?
From: "Greg Haerr" ####@####.####
Date: 12 Jul 2006 04:09:14 +0100
Message-Id: <096e01c6a560$77f842c0$2f01a8c0@HaydenLake>

: > The XtoNX.h wrapper is very obsolete.
: 
: if that's the case, shouldn't it be dropped from the repository?

Yeah, probably, along with a number of other things.
It should probably just be made a reference file in
the NXLIB project, since there's still some utility
for educating folks about X11 and Nano-X compatibility
by reading a header file.

Regards,

Greg

Previous by date: 12 Jul 2006 04:09:14 +0100 Re: nano-X is real X server?, Aaron J. Grier
Next by date: 12 Jul 2006 04:09:14 +0100 Image size limit?, Martin Kajdas
Previous in thread: 12 Jul 2006 04:09:14 +0100 Re: nano-X is real X server?, Aaron J. Grier
Next in thread:


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.