nanogui: nano-X is real X server?


Previous by date: 12 Jul 2006 01:12:41 +0100 Re: nano-X is real X server?, Greg Haerr
Next by date: 12 Jul 2006 01:12:41 +0100 Re: nano-X is real X server?, Greg Haerr
Previous in thread: 12 Jul 2006 01:12:41 +0100 Re: nano-X is real X server?, Greg Haerr
Next in thread: 12 Jul 2006 01:12:41 +0100 Re: nano-X is real X server?, Greg Haerr

Subject: Re: [nanogui] Re: nano-X is real X server?
From: "Aaron J. Grier" ####@####.####
Date: 12 Jul 2006 01:12:41 +0100
Message-Id: <20060712001233.GT18581@mordor.unix.fryenet>

On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 02:43:16PM -0700, Greg Haerr wrote:
> > no, but you can recompile X programs with the XtoNX.h header
> > wrapper, and get quite a few X programs running with nano-X.
> 
> The XtoNX.h wrapper is very obsolete.

if that's the case, shouldn't it be dropped from the repository?

-- 
  Aaron J. Grier  |   Frye Electronics, Tigard, OR   |  ####@####.####

Previous by date: 12 Jul 2006 01:12:41 +0100 Re: nano-X is real X server?, Greg Haerr
Next by date: 12 Jul 2006 01:12:41 +0100 Re: nano-X is real X server?, Greg Haerr
Previous in thread: 12 Jul 2006 01:12:41 +0100 Re: nano-X is real X server?, Greg Haerr
Next in thread: 12 Jul 2006 01:12:41 +0100 Re: nano-X is real X server?, Greg Haerr


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.