nanogui: Widget library within the nanoX approach ...


Previous by date: 25 Jan 2007 18:01:45 +0000 Re: Widget library within the nanoX approach ..., Junior
Next by date: 25 Jan 2007 18:01:45 +0000 Re: Widget library within the nanoX approach ..., Martin Kajdas
Previous in thread: 25 Jan 2007 18:01:45 +0000 Re: Widget library within the nanoX approach ..., Junior
Next in thread: 25 Jan 2007 18:01:45 +0000 Re: Widget library within the nanoX approach ..., Martin Kajdas

Subject: RE: [nanogui] Widget library within the nanoX approach ...
From: Alberto La Rosa ####@####.####
Date: 25 Jan 2007 18:01:45 +0000
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0701251856150.26934@localhost>

I forgot to highlight that I am targetting an embedded application and 
avoid to use C++ could be usefull in order to reduce both static and 
dinamic memory footprint.

I just run the FTLK hello_word example... and I got a 164K stripped 
executable on my i686 X11 linux workstation (not within nanoX! do I have 
to expect very different results?).

I hope a C based approach will save memory!

Ciao!
Alberto


On Thu, 25 Jan 2007, Junior wrote:

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ####@####.####
>> Sent: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 09:31:10 -0800
>> To: ####@####.#### ####@####.####
>> Subject: RE: [nanogui] Widget library within the nanoX approach ...
>>
>> A lot of folks use FLTK widgets with nanoX + nxlib, me included and it
>> works very well.
>> Martin
>>
>
> That's for those who uses C++, I believe most, including me, don't.
>
> --Jr.
>
>
>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Alberto La Rosa ####@####.####
>> Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 9:26 AM
>> To: ####@####.####
>> Subject: [nanogui] Widget library within the nanoX approach ...
>>
>> I am looking for a widget GUI library to be used on top of NanoX.
>>
>> I found nanoGTK project but it looks like to be not maintained any more.
>>
>> : ftp://ftp.microwindows.org/pub/microwindows
>> :
>> : There are three files named:
>> :
>> : NanoGTK-1.0-src.tgz
>> : NanoGTK-1.0pre1-shared.tgz
>> : NanoGTK-1.0pre1.tgz
>>
>> I would like to ask you which alternatives there are and which you
>> suggest to look at if I would like to use nanox and have a widget
>> library comfortable to use for building GUI.
>>
>> NanoX alone seems to be very very basic in functionalities, and in the
>> best of my understanding I will have to develop all my custom widget
>> from scratch, isn'n it?
>>
>> Many thanks in advance.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Alberto
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ####@####.####
>> For additional commands, e-mail: ####@####.####
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ####@####.####
>> For additional commands, e-mail: ####@####.####
>

Previous by date: 25 Jan 2007 18:01:45 +0000 Re: Widget library within the nanoX approach ..., Junior
Next by date: 25 Jan 2007 18:01:45 +0000 Re: Widget library within the nanoX approach ..., Martin Kajdas
Previous in thread: 25 Jan 2007 18:01:45 +0000 Re: Widget library within the nanoX approach ..., Junior
Next in thread: 25 Jan 2007 18:01:45 +0000 Re: Widget library within the nanoX approach ..., Martin Kajdas


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.