nanogui: FLTK 2.0 followup


Previous by date: 24 Jul 2007 16:36:54 +0100 Re: NanoX -- Recommended development approach?, Martin Kajdas
Next by date: 24 Jul 2007 16:36:54 +0100 Re: NanoX -- Recommended development approach?, Ricardo Jasinski
Previous in thread: 24 Jul 2007 16:36:54 +0100 Re: FLTK 2.0 followup, Martin Kajdas
Next in thread: 24 Jul 2007 16:36:54 +0100 Re: FLTK 2.0 followup, Greg Haerr

Subject: RE: [nanogui] FLTK 2.0 followup
From: Graham Henderson ####@####.####
Date: 24 Jul 2007 16:36:54 +0100
Message-Id: <545440.3873.qm@web32015.mail.mud.yahoo.com>

Michael:

I have gotted eCos to run the non-fltk part of my application in client/server mode.  As you may recall, my application linked directly to the server before.

I have added the button test application to my code and it will execute to a point.  I am currently throwing a Data Abort exception in SVR_GrPeekEvent.  In addition, the following unsupported (nxlib 0.45) routines are being called:

XSetErrorHandler
XSetLocaleModifier
XOpenIM

More as it develops.

Graham
 

"McCune, Michael" ####@####.#### wrote: Graham,

Sounds like you are very close to testing it out, please keep us posted I would love to hear how things go.

Mike McCune
Navigation Solutions
248 282 5407


-----Original Message-----
From: Graham Henderson ####@####.####
Sent: Mon 7/23/2007 3:44 PM
To: McCune, Michael; ####@####.####
Subject: Re: [nanogui] FLTK 2.0 followup
 
Michael:

Thank you for your replies.  Yes....that is where I  am at  right now.  I have added the missing functions to the stub.c file to get eCos/nxlib/fltk2 and my application code to compile.

Within eCos, both the client and the server reside in the same space with the application.  I also needed to add some SVC_[fuinctionname] definitions to serv.h to make nano-x happy.

I just need to resolve two more undefined references and it will be time for a smoke test.

Graham...



       
---------------------------------
Yahoo! oneSearch: Finally,  mobile search that gives answers, not web links. 

Previous by date: 24 Jul 2007 16:36:54 +0100 Re: NanoX -- Recommended development approach?, Martin Kajdas
Next by date: 24 Jul 2007 16:36:54 +0100 Re: NanoX -- Recommended development approach?, Ricardo Jasinski
Previous in thread: 24 Jul 2007 16:36:54 +0100 Re: FLTK 2.0 followup, Martin Kajdas
Next in thread: 24 Jul 2007 16:36:54 +0100 Re: FLTK 2.0 followup, Greg Haerr


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.