nanogui: source tree
Subject:
Re: source tree
From:
Chris Ross ####@####.####
Date:
15 Dec 1999 13:33:24 -0000
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.10.9912151325120.22749-100000@vortex.ukshells.co.uk>
On 15 Dec 1999, Vidar Hokstad wrote:
> This has been discussed quite a few times before.
>
> As long as it doesn't increase the size of Nano-X or applications
> using Nano-X, then I'm all for it. However, I still believe that
> to make Nano-X anywhere near source compatible with X, you'd have
> to add a lot of cruft that doesn't belong in a small, compact system.
>
> Vidar Hokstad
> VP R&D, Screen Media AS
>
i personally think it's necessary to make is source compatible
so that we can take apps from x and recompile them. that way
we can almost instantly clobber the apps issue and toolkit
issue in one fell swoop. we can also design it such that it can
be compile with only the necessary chunk that are required.
ie if atoms andhints aren't required then dont compile them in.
this is just my two pence worth.
