nanogui: source tree


Previous by date: 15 Dec 1999 13:27:13 -0000 source tree, Chris Ross
Next by date: 15 Dec 1999 13:27:13 -0000 Re: source tree, Chris Ross
Previous in thread: 15 Dec 1999 13:27:13 -0000 source tree, Chris Ross
Next in thread: 15 Dec 1999 13:27:13 -0000 Re: source tree, Chris Ross

Subject: Re: source tree
From: "Vidar Hokstad" ####@####.####
Date: 15 Dec 1999 13:27:13 -0000
Message-Id: <19991215132825.5502.qmail@mail.relight.com>

On Wed, 15 Dec 1999 12:30:37 +0000 (GMT) you wrote: 
>i think the source tree needs to be tidied up abit with   
>a better structure. i am happy to sit down and write  
>Makefile.am and a configure.in so what we can make the  
>source tree easier to compile on yet more os'. one  
>f the reasons being is that i would like to be able to use  
>nanox + X11 on solaris.  
>  
>on another note following what i said about the gtk port  
>i was thinking that it might be an idea to rewrite nanox  
>to have an api far more similar to X. this means that  
>it can be completey restructured. this would include using  
>event structures and window structes etc excatly as  
>X does. the all anano x calls can be n<X call> and then  
>have macro substituions on compile time.   
 
This has been discussed quite a few times before. 
 
As long as it doesn't increase the size of Nano-X or applications 
using Nano-X, then I'm all for it. However, I still believe that 
to make Nano-X anywhere near source compatible with X, you'd have 
to add a lot of cruft that doesn't belong in a small, compact system. 
 
Vidar Hokstad 
VP R&D, Screen Media AS 

Previous by date: 15 Dec 1999 13:27:13 -0000 source tree, Chris Ross
Next by date: 15 Dec 1999 13:27:13 -0000 Re: source tree, Chris Ross
Previous in thread: 15 Dec 1999 13:27:13 -0000 source tree, Chris Ross
Next in thread: 15 Dec 1999 13:27:13 -0000 Re: source tree, Chris Ross


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.