nanogui: Re: [nanogui] Is Nano-X dead? - Move to SVN+Trac?


Previous by date: 7 Jul 2008 14:17:58 -0000 Re: [nanogui] Is Nano-X dead? - Move to SVN+Trac?, DanielNyström
Next by date: 7 Jul 2008 14:17:58 -0000 Re: Is Nano-X dead? - Move to SVN+Trac?, Greg Haerr
Previous in thread: 7 Jul 2008 14:17:58 -0000 Re: [nanogui] Is Nano-X dead? - Move to SVN+Trac?, DanielNyström
Next in thread: 7 Jul 2008 14:17:58 -0000 Re: Is Nano-X dead? - Move to SVN+Trac?, Greg Haerr

Subject: Re: [nanogui] Is Nano-X dead? - Move to SVN+Trac?
From: "Vladimir Ananiev" ####@####.####
Date: 7 Jul 2008 14:17:58 -0000
Message-Id: <ce55079f0807070717u7474f676l1224d69d59cb3500@mail.gmail.com>

I am fully agree with this. People move from Nano-X because they see
the last news on site were in 2005 - so they think it is dead.

2008/7/7, Daniel Nyström ####@####.####
> I'd like once again to push for a move to SVN (or better, Bazaar) and
>  using Trac for the website. Then many people could contribute easier
>  both on code but as well the documentation if held in the Wiki included
>  with Trac.
>
>  And it will probably make the project appear more active than it does
>  currently, which hopefully generates more users and contributors.
>
>  Regards
>  Daniel
>
>  On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 11:41 +0200, Fredrik Johansson wrote:
>  > James Johnston skrev:
>  > > I'm looking to use Nano-X in a new open-source project, but the last update
>  > > was in 2005.  Is the project basically dead?  From all appearances this
>  > > appears to be the case.
>  > >
>  > > Best regards,
>  > >
>  > > James Johnston
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: ####@####.####
>  > > For additional commands, e-mail: ####@####.####
>  > >
>  > >
>  > Nah, it's not dead, it just hasn't had any release for some time now,
>  > the cvs is still beeing updated.
>  >
>  > Here's a snippet from the changelog:
>  >
>  >     * fix .fnt.gz loader padding bug
>  > 6 January 2008 - neuros patches from Vladimir
>  >     * add generic window message send GrSendMsg, GR_EVENT_MSG,
>  > GR_EVENT_MASK_MSG
>  >     * add alpha channel handling in GdDrawImage, alpha support in PNG loader
>  >     * fix bug in GdGetNextTimeout
>  >     * add GrDrawImagePartToFit - draw image from part of source image
>  >     * add MWMODE_SRCTRANSCOPY support in fblin16, applyOp{3,4} macros
>  > for speed
>  >     * remove #include <asm/page.h> in clientfb.c, PAGE_SIZE now internal
>  >     * fix GsWpDrawBackgroundPixmap to work with pixmap window backgrounds
>  > 30 November 2007
>  >     * fix ftell in FNTGZ font subdriver
>  >     * port AGG AntiGrain Geometry, NXLIB and direct hw fb version
>  >     * add MWPF_HWPIXELVAL run-time pixel type to allow no-translation GrArea
>  >     * add back in low level psd->DrawArea for fast GdArea
>  >     * rewrite GdArcAngle to fix bug w/small angles, no fp required
>  >     * add font file parameter to fontdemo
>  > 9 September 2007 - ####@####.####
>  >     * fix EPRINTF for gcc 3.x (Petr)
>  >     * fix ft1 return on zero height/width characters (Alexander)
>  >     * fix GrNewBitmapFromData pad when byte swapped (Martin)
>  >     * break GrBitmap requests into MAXREQUESTSZ size packets (Martin)
>  >     * fixed freetype2 font rotation, baseline, compile w/cache off bugs
>  >     * added support for freetype2 2.3.5 (forces cache off for now)
>  > 22 June 2006 - ####@####.####
>  >     * added complete rop processing to fblin4.c 4bpp driver
>  > 21 April 2006 - ####@####.####
>  >     * obtained permission to convert stretchblit code from LGPL to MPL
>  > 20 December 2005 - ####@####.####
>  >     * added support for 16bpp 5/5/5 and 5/6/5 images to GdDrawImage (Greg)
>  >     * added support for 16bpp and 32bpp .bmp files
>  >
>
>
>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: ####@####.####
>  For additional commands, e-mail: ####@####.####
>
>

Previous by date: 7 Jul 2008 14:17:58 -0000 Re: [nanogui] Is Nano-X dead? - Move to SVN+Trac?, DanielNyström
Next by date: 7 Jul 2008 14:17:58 -0000 Re: Is Nano-X dead? - Move to SVN+Trac?, Greg Haerr
Previous in thread: 7 Jul 2008 14:17:58 -0000 Re: [nanogui] Is Nano-X dead? - Move to SVN+Trac?, DanielNyström
Next in thread: 7 Jul 2008 14:17:58 -0000 Re: Is Nano-X dead? - Move to SVN+Trac?, Greg Haerr


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.