nanogui: Re: [nanogui] Is Nano-X dead? - Move to SVN+Trac?
Subject:
Re: Is Nano-X dead? - Move to SVN+Trac?
From:
"Aaron J. Grier" ####@####.####
Date:
7 Jul 2008 20:22:12 -0000
Message-Id: <20080707202207.GR835@mordor.unix.fryenet>
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 12:05:57PM -0700, Greg Haerr wrote:
> With regards to SCCS, I've always been nervous with allowing write
> capability, because most contributers aren't testing on enough
> platforms (and more importantly framebuffer modes. However, this was
> done in the past for the eCos and RTEMS platforms. I think moving to
> a git-style SCCS would allow users to easily house and handle
> contributions if not to the whole, then to each other.
provided that there's some way to import from CVS, I don't imagine the
choice of SCCS being terribly important, but I would hate to start from
ground zero in my continual merge process. I'm having to do enough hand
work as is.
--
Aaron J. Grier | Frye Electronics, Tigard, OR | ####@####.####
