nanogui: Re: [nanogui] Is Nano-X dead? - Move to SVN+Trac?
Subject:
Re: [nanogui] Re: Is Nano-X dead? - Move to SVN+Trac?
From:
"Aaron J. Grier" ####@####.####
Date:
8 Jul 2008 23:23:12 -0000
Message-Id: <20080708232307.GU835@mordor.unix.fryenet>
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 03:57:38PM -0700, Greg Haerr wrote:
> > provided that there's some way to import from CVS, I don't imagine
> > the choice of SCCS being terribly important, but I would hate to
> > start from ground zero in my continual merge process.
>
> Do you mean import TO CVS? I know git for instance allows importing
> from CVS projects, but I'm not sure about its ability to export to
> CVS... something to consider for sure.
I'm more concerned about going from CVS to the new SCCS. it would be
nice to retain the ability to merge from some point in the past. here
at Frye we are still running a fork of 0.89, and I'd desparately like to
get as much as I can back into the tree, but it doesn't make a lot of
sense until I'm merged with a more recent version of HEAD.
I'm not too worried about going forward, as I assume whatever is chosen
will continue to have source code for unix (Linux and NetBSD) clients
available.
--
Aaron J. Grier | Frye Electronics, Tigard, OR | ####@####.####
