nanogui: Licensing


Previous by date: 13 May 1999 16:24:54 -0000 Re: bogl library isn't buggy, Vidar Hokstad
Next by date: 13 May 1999 16:24:54 -0000 compiled font size, Greg Haerr
Previous in thread: 13 May 1999 16:24:54 -0000 Re: Licensing, Alex Holden
Next in thread: 13 May 1999 16:24:54 -0000 Re: Licensing, Alex Holden

Subject: RE: Re[2]: Licensing
From: Greg Haerr ####@####.####
Date: 13 May 1999 16:24:54 -0000
Message-Id: <01BE9D2A.9CB72C70.greg@censoft.com>

> If I am interpreting this correctly, we can license the code we have under
> the MPL, and then any "Modifications" to our code need to be contributed
> back to us, but any new code distributed along with it (and it doesn't
> explicitly disallow statically linking to it) can be under whatever
> license you want. This would seem to be just what we want. Opinions?
>

I like it, but, my gosh, the MPL is a large load of legalese...

gh

Previous by date: 13 May 1999 16:24:54 -0000 Re: bogl library isn't buggy, Vidar Hokstad
Next by date: 13 May 1999 16:24:54 -0000 compiled font size, Greg Haerr
Previous in thread: 13 May 1999 16:24:54 -0000 Re: Licensing, Alex Holden
Next in thread: 13 May 1999 16:24:54 -0000 Re: Licensing, Alex Holden


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.