nanogui: Linux example binaries


Previous by date: 24 Jun 2000 16:31:38 -0000 Re: Linux example binaries, Kyle Harris
Next by date: 24 Jun 2000 16:31:38 -0000 Re: Linux example binaries, Erwin Rol
Previous in thread: 24 Jun 2000 16:31:38 -0000 Re: Linux example binaries, Kyle Harris
Next in thread: 24 Jun 2000 16:31:38 -0000 Re: Linux example binaries, Erwin Rol

Subject: Re: Linux example binaries
From: "Frank W. Miller" ####@####.####
Date: 24 Jun 2000 16:31:38 -0000
Message-Id: <200006241528.LAA06777@macalpine.cornfed.com>

First off, thanks for all the response!  I was overwhelmed by the amount
of help I received.  I first built under X and ran some of the binaries
and then I added fb support to my kernel and ran a couple of demos.

Just as a note in passing, having nothing to do with uwindows.  Like I
mentioned before, I've been using FreeBSD for about 5 years now and I
recently made the switch to Linux.  The main reason was the availability
of applications but I noticed something else.  The file system is 
dramatically faster for things like tar xzvf and /bin/rm -fr than that
of FreeBSD.  The network code is close to FreeBSD but still noticably
slower for things like FTP downloads.  Whats up with the file system 
code?

FM

--
Frank W. Miller
Cornfed Systems Inc
www.cornfed.com

Previous by date: 24 Jun 2000 16:31:38 -0000 Re: Linux example binaries, Kyle Harris
Next by date: 24 Jun 2000 16:31:38 -0000 Re: Linux example binaries, Erwin Rol
Previous in thread: 24 Jun 2000 16:31:38 -0000 Re: Linux example binaries, Kyle Harris
Next in thread: 24 Jun 2000 16:31:38 -0000 Re: Linux example binaries, Erwin Rol


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.