nanogui: tcl/tk for nano-X ?


Previous by date: 19 Nov 2000 03:45:58 -0000 Re: Multiple famebuffer, Marc Nijdam
Next by date: 19 Nov 2000 03:45:58 -0000 Re: tcl/tk for nano-X ?, Alan Cox
Previous in thread: 19 Nov 2000 03:45:58 -0000 Re: tcl/tk for nano-X ?, Steve Redler
Next in thread: 19 Nov 2000 03:45:58 -0000 Re: tcl/tk for nano-X ?, Alan Cox

Subject: Re: tcl/tk for nano-X ?
From: Joe deBlaquiere ####@####.####
Date: 19 Nov 2000 03:45:58 -0000
Message-Id: <3A174CC4.50BC27A5@redhat.com>

So is there a better answer? Having written applications from scratch for
Xlib, Xt, and Motif, I would really rather not have to write an X-like
callback by hand again. There's just too much overhead to "hello world".
tcl/tk is about the level of effort that should be put into an occasional-use
UI component anyway, but I'm ceratinly open to sugestions...

Alan Cox wrote:

> > I started looking at developing some system configuration utilites (such
> > as kppp equivalent) and realized that I was much too lazy to write apps
> > from scratch ;o). Has anyone started an implementation of tcl/tk for
> > nano-X?
>
> There really isnt much point. If you are going to use several megabytes of
> tcl/tk you might as well use X11.
>
> Alan
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ####@####.####
> For additional commands, e-mail: ####@####.####

--
Joe deBlaquiere
Red Hat, Inc.
307 Wynn Drive
Huntsville AL, 35805
voice : (256)-704-9200
fax   : (256)-837-3839




Previous by date: 19 Nov 2000 03:45:58 -0000 Re: Multiple famebuffer, Marc Nijdam
Next by date: 19 Nov 2000 03:45:58 -0000 Re: tcl/tk for nano-X ?, Alan Cox
Previous in thread: 19 Nov 2000 03:45:58 -0000 Re: tcl/tk for nano-X ?, Steve Redler
Next in thread: 19 Nov 2000 03:45:58 -0000 Re: tcl/tk for nano-X ?, Alan Cox


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.