nanogui: tcl/tk for nano-X ?
Subject:
Re: tcl/tk for nano-X ?
From:
Steve Redler ####@####.####
Date:
17 Nov 2000 20:55:07 -0000
Message-Id: <00111715582402.16791@roto>
On Fri, 17 Nov 2000, you wrote:
> > I started looking at developing some system configuration utilites (such
> > as kppp equivalent) and realized that I was much too lazy to write apps
> > from scratch ;o). Has anyone started an implementation of tcl/tk for
> > nano-X?
>
> There really isnt much point. If you are going to use several megabytes of
> tcl/tk you might as well use X11.
>
>
>
> Alan
Well, just for comparison, a semi-static "wish8.2.3", with dependencys only to libc,libm,etc
(in other words with tcl linked statically in) ends up around 480k on the iPAQ. Throw in the
text libraries and Im only up to 850k. Thats a lot of scripting power in a small package.
--
Steve Redler IV, Sysadmin
####@####.####
DISCLAIMER: Microsoft, Windows, Windows 98, Bugs, Lacking features, IRQ conflicts,
System crashes, Non-functional multitasking, the Y2K problem and the Blue Screen of Death
are registered trademarks of Microsoft, Corp., Redmond, USA.
No violation of copyright intended.
No Microsoft product was used in any way to write or send this text.
If you use a Microsoft product to read it, you're doing so at your own risk.
"The ultimate result is that some innovations that would truly benefit
consumers never occur for the sole reason that they do not coincide with
Microsoft's self-interest." -- Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson, U.S. District Judge
