nanogui: Child Windows


Previous by date: 26 Jan 2001 19:48:08 -0000 Re: Compilinging .xbm bitmap file into Nanox pixmaps, Alex Holden
Next by date: 26 Jan 2001 19:48:08 -0000 Re: Child Windows, Jordan Crouse
Previous in thread: 26 Jan 2001 19:48:08 -0000 Re: Child Windows, Greg Haerr
Next in thread: 26 Jan 2001 19:48:08 -0000 Re: Child Windows, Jordan Crouse

Subject: Re: Child Windows
From: Alex Holden ####@####.####
Date: 26 Jan 2001 19:48:08 -0000
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.04.10101261944300.3716-100000@hyperspace.linuxhacker.org>

On Fri, 26 Jan 2001, Greg Haerr wrote:
> this for backwards compatibility, so that older apps would get a
> window decoration.  Now I'm wondering whether it might
> be time to undo that, and require a separate decoration bit.

I don't think that there's any point carrying this kind of backwards
compatibility baggage around. Once we reach a stable 1.0 release okay, but
until then the Nano-X API and protocol are still under development and
subject to non backwards compatible changes from time to time (when
there's a good reason for it, as in this case).

-- 
------- Alex Holden -------
http://www.linuxhacker.org/
 http://www.robogeeks.org/


Previous by date: 26 Jan 2001 19:48:08 -0000 Re: Compilinging .xbm bitmap file into Nanox pixmaps, Alex Holden
Next by date: 26 Jan 2001 19:48:08 -0000 Re: Child Windows, Jordan Crouse
Previous in thread: 26 Jan 2001 19:48:08 -0000 Re: Child Windows, Greg Haerr
Next in thread: 26 Jan 2001 19:48:08 -0000 Re: Child Windows, Jordan Crouse


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.