nanogui: Re: nanoGui development


Previous by date: 5 May 1999 18:52:12 -0000 Re: nanogui development, Greg Haerr
Next by date: 5 May 1999 18:52:12 -0000 Re: nanoterm, Greg Haerr
Previous in thread: 5 May 1999 18:52:12 -0000 Re: nanogui development, Greg Haerr
Next in thread: 5 May 1999 18:52:12 -0000 Re: nanoGui development, Greg Haerr

Subject: Re: nanogui development
From: ####@####.#### (Alan Cox)
Date: 5 May 1999 18:52:12 -0000
Message-Id: <m10f7aB-0007TwC@the-village.bc.nu>

> the clipping work that you added is basically the same, but placed one procedure
> higher, and removed from the lowest level line draw code.  Thus, the extra
> overhead is only one extra procedure call.  Don't you agree?

Maybe I missed some obvious approaches. You could be right thinking about this.
I was obviously asleep last time


Previous by date: 5 May 1999 18:52:12 -0000 Re: nanogui development, Greg Haerr
Next by date: 5 May 1999 18:52:12 -0000 Re: nanoterm, Greg Haerr
Previous in thread: 5 May 1999 18:52:12 -0000 Re: nanogui development, Greg Haerr
Next in thread: 5 May 1999 18:52:12 -0000 Re: nanoGui development, Greg Haerr


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.