nanogui: Why Microwin


Previous by date: 20 Feb 2001 19:10:45 -0000 Re: Really raw keyboard?, Greg Haerr
Next by date: 20 Feb 2001 19:10:45 -0000 Re: Why Microwin, Andreas Pour
Previous in thread: 20 Feb 2001 19:10:45 -0000 Why Microwin, Idit Neuman
Next in thread: 20 Feb 2001 19:10:45 -0000 Re: Why Microwin, Andreas Pour

Subject: Re: Why Microwin
From: "John Waldron" ####@####.####
Date: 20 Feb 2001 19:10:45 -0000
Message-Id: <0b9301c09b71$a5d085d0$6401a8c0@fletchii>

What are the royalties (if any) associated with QT?

John

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Idit Neuman" ####@####.####
To: "Nanogui (E-mail)" ####@####.####
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 11:35 AM
Subject: Why Microwin


> Hi all,
> 
> I have to choose the graphical system to our embedded Linux system
> the two competitors are QT and Microwin.
> Since the documentation is not the best part of microwindows, 
> I need some help to understand what makes Microwindows better.
> One more question I have is what exactly it meant by saying in the Docs 
> that it takes 50 - 250 kb, What exactly did you measure?
> 
> Thanks,
> Idit
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ####@####.####
> For additional commands, e-mail: ####@####.####
> 
> 


Previous by date: 20 Feb 2001 19:10:45 -0000 Re: Really raw keyboard?, Greg Haerr
Next by date: 20 Feb 2001 19:10:45 -0000 Re: Why Microwin, Andreas Pour
Previous in thread: 20 Feb 2001 19:10:45 -0000 Why Microwin, Idit Neuman
Next in thread: 20 Feb 2001 19:10:45 -0000 Re: Why Microwin, Andreas Pour


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.