nanogui: Why Microwin


Previous by date: 20 Feb 2001 16:31:43 -0000 Re: Running Nano-X and ViewML separately, Supriyo Chatterjea
Next by date: 20 Feb 2001 16:31:43 -0000 Re: Really raw keyboard?, Greg Haerr
Previous in thread:
Next in thread: 20 Feb 2001 16:31:43 -0000 Re: Why Microwin, John Waldron

Subject: Why Microwin
From: Idit Neuman ####@####.####
Date: 20 Feb 2001 16:31:43 -0000
Message-Id: <89B4A0A0CEE6D41180BA0002A5096E4003E0DE@SKODA>

Hi all,

I have to choose the graphical system to our embedded Linux system
the two competitors are QT and Microwin.
Since the documentation is not the best part of microwindows, 
I need some help to understand what makes Microwindows better.
One more question I have is what exactly it meant by saying in the Docs 
that it takes 50 - 250 kb, What exactly did you measure?

Thanks,
Idit

Previous by date: 20 Feb 2001 16:31:43 -0000 Re: Running Nano-X and ViewML separately, Supriyo Chatterjea
Next by date: 20 Feb 2001 16:31:43 -0000 Re: Really raw keyboard?, Greg Haerr
Previous in thread:
Next in thread: 20 Feb 2001 16:31:43 -0000 Re: Why Microwin, John Waldron


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.