nanogui: GTK+ port to nano-X


Previous by date: 11 May 2001 09:09:03 -0000 Re: how to get the input of KEY?, Gary James
Next by date: 11 May 2001 09:09:03 -0000 Re: Screenshot, yi yang
Previous in thread: 11 May 2001 09:09:03 -0000 Re: GTK+ port to nano-X, Jordan Crouse
Next in thread: 11 May 2001 09:09:03 -0000 Re: GTK+ port to nano-X, Amit Kulkarni

Subject: Re: GTK+ port to nano-X
From: Julian Smart ####@####.####
Date: 11 May 2001 09:09:03 -0000
Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.20010511100041.056a4f00@pop>

At 01:23 PM 5/10/01 -0600, Jeff Wood wrote:
>Hi,
>         I ran across an archived e-mail concerning a possible port
>of GTK/GDk to nano-X.  Some of the follow-up e-mail suggested a
>"glue" layer be built between GTK and TinyWidgets (presumably
>already ported?).
>         We are dedicated to running wxGTK (somehow) over nano-X.

Cool :-) (The author for wxGTK, aka wxWindows for GTK+, is a colleague of 
mine on the wxWindows project, http://www.wxwindows.org.)

>To the best of my knowledge, it seems like we could take one of
>three approaches:
>
>         1) wait for wxGTK to port to its own widget set (apparently
>          in the works).

Yes, that would be wxUniv or 'wxUniversal' (in that the widgets are all 
generic, non-native implementations and so easily ported to framebuffers 
etc.), sponsored by SciTech Software. Sounds like progress is good but 
there's a couple of months work or so before code is made available, and 
the code needs to be merged with current wxWin CVS which will be a challenge.

>         2) use the GDK port available (at least partially)
>          in rel 1.3.1.
>       3) provide/obtain a "glue" layer between GTK and TinyWidgets.
>
>         I would be interested in any comments/opinions people might
>have ("you'll all die", "what a stupid idea", etc).

In cases (2) and (3) you'd be relying on at least 2 layers -- wxWindows + 
another -- whereas (1) has the advantage of being more direct and 'only' 
relying on a wxWindows implementation, which might simplify matters. 
However in all scenarios there is a fair bit of work to be done...

Anyway if progress is demonstrated of wxWindows running on Nano-X, I'm sure 
guys here at Red Hat will be interested, since we are already using 
wxWindows on the host side of eCos, and there will no doubt be client & 
internal interest in writing C++ GUI applications for eCos/Nano-X.

Regards,

Julian
--
Red Hat UK Ltd, Unit 200 Rustat House, 62 Clifton Road, Cambridge, UK. CB1 
7EG Tel: +44 (1223) 271063

Previous by date: 11 May 2001 09:09:03 -0000 Re: how to get the input of KEY?, Gary James
Next by date: 11 May 2001 09:09:03 -0000 Re: Screenshot, yi yang
Previous in thread: 11 May 2001 09:09:03 -0000 Re: GTK+ port to nano-X, Jordan Crouse
Next in thread: 11 May 2001 09:09:03 -0000 Re: GTK+ port to nano-X, Amit Kulkarni


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.