nanogui: ideology of flnx
Subject:
ideology of flnx
From:
"David T Eger" ####@####.####
Date:
13 Jul 2001 05:05:33 -0000
Message-Id: <OFF0420294.496538D6-ON85256A88.001BA8B0@raleigh.ibm.com>
I was wondering as to the ideology of the FLTK / Nano-X port. It seems
very curious - it was branched off of FLTK 1.0.7 (over a year ago) and it
seems as though there has been no effort to keep it synced. Is this
intentional? That is, is FLNX a distinctly different beast, or has the
effort simply not been made to keep it current?
On the one hand, if it were kept current, it is conceivable that nano-x
could be one of the standard build options for FLTK. On the other hand, if
FLNX is distinct, then why bother #ifdef'ing all of the NANO_X code, and
not simply replace what exists with what it should be specifically for
Nano-X?
-David
