nanogui: Are we allowed to mandate GrFlush()?


Previous by date: 7 Aug 2001 15:06:02 -0000 New multibyte support patch available., 이상백
Next by date: 7 Aug 2001 15:06:02 -0000 Re: Are we allowed to mandate GrFlush()?, Jordan Crouse
Previous in thread:
Next in thread: 7 Aug 2001 15:06:02 -0000 Re: Are we allowed to mandate GrFlush()?, Jordan Crouse

Subject: Are we allowed to mandate GrFlush()?
From: Steven Stadnicki ####@####.####
Date: 7 Aug 2001 15:06:02 -0000
Message-Id: <3B7003E7.8BBB75DA@equator.com>

I'm looking at what amounts to a double- or triple-buffered display
system
where the simplest scheme to handle what I want to do is to mandate the
user to 'flush' from his primary output buffer to a display buffer.  I'm
thinking
of trying to do this by making GrFlush not just a good idea but in fact
mandatory after a set of draw operations when the user is ready to
display
to the screen, but I'm wondering if this is really legitimate, or
whether too
many programs assume that what they draw will automatically be displayed

and don't bother calling GrFlush().

Steven Stadnicki
####@####.####



Previous by date: 7 Aug 2001 15:06:02 -0000 New multibyte support patch available., 이상백
Next by date: 7 Aug 2001 15:06:02 -0000 Re: Are we allowed to mandate GrFlush()?, Jordan Crouse
Previous in thread:
Next in thread: 7 Aug 2001 15:06:02 -0000 Re: Are we allowed to mandate GrFlush()?, Jordan Crouse


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.