nanogui: Fram buffer..
Subject:
Re: [nanogui] Fram buffer..
From:
Jordan Crouse ####@####.####
Date:
8 Mar 2002 21:13:29 -0000
Message-Id: <1015621503.10338.1.camel@cosmic>
Writing a framebuffer driver is always the best - that way you can
provide a consistent interface to Microwindows and use the already
stable framebuffer code.
Jordan
On Fri, 2002-03-08 at 11:14, Carlos Dri wrote:
> I've got a similar problem....... what is a better choice???? to write a fb
> driver or to write all the WritePixel, Readpixel etc. functions??? Where can
> I find a good "skeleton" of a frame buffer driver????
>
> TIA.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "safiudeen Ts" ####@####.####
> To: ####@####.####
> Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 5:59 AM
> Subject: [nanogui] Fram buffer..
>
>
> >
> >
> > After some struggle with the make file and toolchains,finally
> > I got microwindows compiled for target(ARM7TDMI-eb63 board)
> > running uClinux-2.0.38. I wrote a small test program
> >
> > to create a windows and put some printf to see whether
> > it runs or not.I could't see the printf message in minicom
> > (I used minicom for console) but it show the message
> > "can't initialize /dev/fb0". It is obvious because
> > I did't have fram_buffer driver in the kernel.I think
> > the test program is running in the board.
> >
> > please can you help me to initiate writing the fram
> > buffer driver for my LCD display.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > safiudeen
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
> > http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: ####@####.####
> > For additional commands, e-mail: ####@####.####
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ####@####.####
> For additional commands, e-mail: ####@####.####
>
>
