nanogui: BitBlt performance?


Previous by date: 19 Mar 2002 14:23:46 -0000 Re: BitBlt performance?, Narasimha Reddy K
Next by date: 19 Mar 2002 14:23:46 -0000 Howto to select /dev/fb1 instead of /dev/fb0 for the framebuffer driver ?, Fabrice Gautier
Previous in thread: 19 Mar 2002 14:23:46 -0000 Re: BitBlt performance?, Narasimha Reddy K
Next in thread: 19 Mar 2002 14:23:46 -0000 Re: BitBlt performance?, Mikhail Ivanov

Subject: Re: [nanogui] BitBlt performance?
From: Alex Holden ####@####.####
Date: 19 Mar 2002 14:23:46 -0000
Message-Id: <3C974875.7040200@linuxhacker.org>

Mikhail Ivanov wrote:
> I'm porting a Win32 application to Microwindows and need a real fast BitBlt;
> I'm using the configuration with framebuffer currently, but the question is, 
> will the blit work faster if a bare SVGA screen driver is used instead of framebuffer?

I believe the linear framebuffer blits are probably in most or all cases 
faster than the SVGALib blit, although admittedly I haven't done any 
benchmarking to prove it.

> (My understanding is that framebuffer is the most popular solution for embedded 
> systems, but what is SVGA driver there for?)

Greg wrote it for x86 Linux 2.0 systems which don't have framebuffer 
support.
-- 
------------ Alex Holden - http://www.linuxhacker.org ------------
If it doesn't work, you're not hitting it with a big enough hammer


Previous by date: 19 Mar 2002 14:23:46 -0000 Re: BitBlt performance?, Narasimha Reddy K
Next by date: 19 Mar 2002 14:23:46 -0000 Howto to select /dev/fb1 instead of /dev/fb0 for the framebuffer driver ?, Fabrice Gautier
Previous in thread: 19 Mar 2002 14:23:46 -0000 Re: BitBlt performance?, Narasimha Reddy K
Next in thread: 19 Mar 2002 14:23:46 -0000 Re: BitBlt performance?, Mikhail Ivanov


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.