nanogui: Nano-X as a component of eCos? (Was: Re: [nanogui] eCos support in CVS)


Previous by date: 4 Apr 2002 21:01:02 -0000 Nano-X as a component of eCos? (Was: Re: [nanogui] eCos support in CVS), ???
Next by date: 4 Apr 2002 21:01:02 -0000 Re: Nano-X as a component of eCos? (Was: Re: [nanogui] eCos suppo rt in CVS), Daniel Fandrich
Previous in thread: 4 Apr 2002 21:01:02 -0000 Nano-X as a component of eCos? (Was: Re: [nanogui] eCos support in CVS), ???
Next in thread: 4 Apr 2002 21:01:02 -0000 Re: Nano-X as a component of eCos? (Was: Re: [nanogui] eCos suppo rt in CVS), Daniel Fandrich

Subject: Re: Nano-X as a component of eCos? (Was: Re: [nanogui] eCos support in CVS)
From: Julian Smart ####@####.####
Date: 4 Apr 2002 21:01:02 -0000
Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.1.20020404215249.03b4aea0@pop3.norton.antivirus>

Hi,

I seem to remember that something of this nature was
mentioned by eCos team members -- it certainly makes sense to me,
though of course it will be some work to update to the latest
versions of Nano-X.

I believe if you post this on ecos-discuss, you'll probably get some
positive feedback.

Thanks,

Julian

At 04:46 05/04/2002 +0800, ??? wrote:
>Hi,
>After some work about porting Nano-X to eCos (I've done some work about
>porting Nano-X to Linux synthetic target last year),
>I think it may be more elegant to incorporate the (CVS Version of )
>Microwincows/Nano-X as a component of eCos,
>in some sort of eCos package since the nature of Nano-X is, in my opinion,
>closer to a library, not to an application.
>
>Making Nano-X an eCos component may also eliminate some unnecessary
>configuration in the Nano-X side
>if we adapt the eCos CDL mechanism to the Nano-X configuration mechanism
>(which is using makefile flags).
>
>Any comment for this idea?
>
>Regards,
>I-Jui Sung
>--
>mailto: ####@####.####
>Department of Computer Science & Information Enginerring,
>National Chiao-Tung University,
>Hsin-Chu, Taiwan
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Julian Smart" ####@####.####
>To: "Daniel Fandrich" ####@####.#### ####@####.####
>Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 4:28 PM
>Subject: Re: [nanogui] eCos support in CVS
>
>
> > At 09:41 20/03/2002 -0800, Daniel Fandrich wrote:
> > >Is someone actively maintaining the eCos support code? Is anyone
>interested
> > >in diffs if not?
> >
> > If you don't hear anything from the eCos team it's certainly not for
> > lack of interest -- Nano-X is part of their long term graphics strategy.
> > So I'm very sure work in this area will be appreciated (I have an interest
> > in it too for future projects).
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Julian
> > ========================================================================
> > Julian Smart              ####@####.####
> > 3 Water Street            http://www.anthemion.co.uk
> > Stamford, Lincs           +44 (0)1780 765976
> > U.K. PE9 2NJ
> > ========================================================================
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: ####@####.####
> > For additional commands, e-mail: ####@####.####
> >

========================================================================
Julian Smart              ####@####.####
3 Water Street            http://www.anthemion.co.uk
Stamford, Lincs           +44 (0)1780 765976
U.K. PE9 2NJ
========================================================================


Previous by date: 4 Apr 2002 21:01:02 -0000 Nano-X as a component of eCos? (Was: Re: [nanogui] eCos support in CVS), ???
Next by date: 4 Apr 2002 21:01:02 -0000 Re: Nano-X as a component of eCos? (Was: Re: [nanogui] eCos suppo rt in CVS), Daniel Fandrich
Previous in thread: 4 Apr 2002 21:01:02 -0000 Nano-X as a component of eCos? (Was: Re: [nanogui] eCos support in CVS), ???
Next in thread: 4 Apr 2002 21:01:02 -0000 Re: Nano-X as a component of eCos? (Was: Re: [nanogui] eCos suppo rt in CVS), Daniel Fandrich


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.