nanogui: nano-X return code 1 with no error information


Previous by date: 1 May 2002 19:26:03 -0000 Idle functions?, Matthew L. Canny
Next by date: 1 May 2002 19:26:03 -0000 Re: Idle functions?, Gary James
Previous in thread: 1 May 2002 19:26:03 -0000 Re: nano-X return code 1 with no error information, Pierre Tardy
Next in thread: 1 May 2002 19:26:03 -0000 Re: nano-X return code 1 with no error information, Greg Haerr

Subject: Re: [nanogui] nano-X return code 1 with no error information
From: Anthony Rassin ####@####.####
Date: 1 May 2002 19:26:03 -0000
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20020501150827.00b1d250@rassin.com>

I tried this and still no luck.  To go a bit further, I've recompiled 
microwindows
to run under X11 and I can run all of the demos without problem.  Unfortunatly
when I compile microwindows with framebuffer support, nano-X won't start.

If I run the demo.sh script my output is
nxclient: bad readblock -1
nxclient 7046: Corrupted packet
nxclient: bad readblock -1
nxclient 7047: Corrupted packet
./demo.sh: line 1:   7046 Broken pipe            bin/nanowm
./demo.sh: line 1:   7047 Broken pipe            bin/world

and if I just run nano-X I still get the 1 errorcode ($?) and no error 
information
and it won't run.
Also, if I run nano-X & it immediatly goes into a stopped state.
  ([1]+  Stopped              bin/nano-X)

Any other ideas?

Thanks,
Anthony

BTW: framebuffer support is compiled into my kernel, and I do see the 
penduin when
I boot, and I'm in vesa fb mode 0301 if that helps.

At 12:03 AM 5/1/2002 +0200, Pierre Tardy wrote:
>On Tue, 30 Apr 2002 17:29:43 -0400
>Anthony Rassin ####@####.#### wrote:
>
> >
> > I've compiled the microwindows 0.89pre8 tarbal on my machine
> > and everything seemed to compile fine.  I then tried to execute
> > some of the demos in the demo dir and I can not get nano-X to
> > run.  I'm just starting it at the command line by typing 'nano-X'
> > and the screen will blink but a ps -ef shows that nano-X is NOT
> > running.  The $? after running nano-X is 1 but there is no error
> > information printed to stderr or stdout when I execute it.
>you should run the demo by running demo##.sh
>or, for ex:
>bin/nano-X & bin/nanowm & bin/launcher bin/launcher.cnf
>run the core    window manager    and the demo
>
>Pierre
>--
>c'est quoi ce quatre et ce huit, dans mon adresse email ???


Previous by date: 1 May 2002 19:26:03 -0000 Idle functions?, Matthew L. Canny
Next by date: 1 May 2002 19:26:03 -0000 Re: Idle functions?, Gary James
Previous in thread: 1 May 2002 19:26:03 -0000 Re: nano-X return code 1 with no error information, Pierre Tardy
Next in thread: 1 May 2002 19:26:03 -0000 Re: nano-X return code 1 with no error information, Greg Haerr


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.