nanogui: Named Socket Binding and romfs


Previous by date: 8 May 2002 19:33:17 -0000 Re: Named Socket Binding and romfs, Dan Fandrich
Next by date: 8 May 2002 19:33:17 -0000 Re: Named Socket Binding and romfs, Alan Cox
Previous in thread: 8 May 2002 19:33:17 -0000 Re: Named Socket Binding and romfs, Dan Fandrich
Next in thread: 8 May 2002 19:33:17 -0000 Re: Named Socket Binding and romfs, Alan Cox

Subject: RE: [nanogui] Named Socket Binding and romfs
From: Fabrice Gautier ####@####.####
Date: 8 May 2002 19:33:17 -0000
Message-Id: <B1F6452C89AFD411AE0800A0CC734C239DBC11@EMAIL1>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dan Fandrich ####@####.####
> Subject: Re: [nanogui] Named Socket Binding and romfs
> 
> 
> On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 11:20:54AM -0700, Fabrice Gautier wrote:
> > 
> > Since my filesystem is read-only, I wont be able to create 
> > named socket. [...]
> 
> Can you mount a small RAM disk on /tmp and store your named 
> pipes there?


Hum.. This means I need to increase the size of my kernel to include ramfs
or something and waste a bit of ram to put this ramfs... not sure i want to
do this just for one named pipe.

> I'm amazed you can do much useful without a writable 
> filesystem of some sort.

Why? I guess it depends what useful means...
I have a shell, and can do many other things without a writable filesystem.
So far nano-X is the only program that is causing me problems.



Previous by date: 8 May 2002 19:33:17 -0000 Re: Named Socket Binding and romfs, Dan Fandrich
Next by date: 8 May 2002 19:33:17 -0000 Re: Named Socket Binding and romfs, Alan Cox
Previous in thread: 8 May 2002 19:33:17 -0000 Re: Named Socket Binding and romfs, Dan Fandrich
Next in thread: 8 May 2002 19:33:17 -0000 Re: Named Socket Binding and romfs, Alan Cox


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.