nanogui: re:


Previous by date: 10 May 1999 18:32:17 -0000 re:, Greg Haerr
Next by date: 10 May 1999 18:32:17 -0000 Nano-X-0.3, Alex Holden
Previous in thread: 10 May 1999 18:32:17 -0000 re:, Greg Haerr
Next in thread: 10 May 1999 18:32:17 -0000 RE:, Darran D. Rimron

Subject: re:
From: Greg Haerr ####@####.####
Date: 10 May 1999 18:32:17 -0000
Message-Id: <01BE9AE1.5F5DE260.greg@censoft.com>

No, the hotspot is relative to the image itself.  The upper level routines
don't check hotspot negative relativity before erasing the cursor.  

The cursor is always clipped if a graphics draw request intersects with the cursor.
If there's no interesection, then you're right, it's not undrawn.

Greg

On Monday, May 10, 1999 12:00 PM, Alan Cox ####@####.#### wrote:
> > 	Well, I understand that, except that with negative hotspot
> > numbers, the graphics subsystem can't create proper "cursor clipping bounding
> > boxes" for the mouse cursor.  In other words, when graphics output
> 
> Umm.. the hot spot doesnt matter surely. Your hot spot can be the other side
> of your desk even, its not drawn so doesnt need clipping ?
> 
> The DOS port is funny btw. Maybe we will get Gtk for DOS next 8)
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ####@####.####
> For additional commands, e-mail: ####@####.####
> 
> 

Previous by date: 10 May 1999 18:32:17 -0000 re:, Greg Haerr
Next by date: 10 May 1999 18:32:17 -0000 Nano-X-0.3, Alex Holden
Previous in thread: 10 May 1999 18:32:17 -0000 re:, Greg Haerr
Next in thread: 10 May 1999 18:32:17 -0000 RE:, Darran D. Rimron


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.