nanogui: Request for comments - Microwindows
Subject:
Re: Request for comments - Microwindows
From:
"Bradley D. LaRonde" ####@####.####
Date:
4 Oct 1999 18:56:53 -0000
Message-Id: <028701bf0e99$41cdba50$b8119526@ltc.com>
----- Original Message -----
From: Greg Haerr ####@####.####
To: 'Bradley D. LaRonde' ####@####.#### ####@####.####
Cc: ####@####.####
Sent: Monday, October 04, 1999 2:51 PM
Subject: RE: Request for comments - Microwindows
>
> : However, it does appear to kill the static model, but ONLY FOR NON-FREE
> : ROGRAMS. Free programs could still use the static model just fine, and
> : non-free programs could still use the client/server model, since the
client
> : side is LGPL.
> :
> Well, we could always have LGPL for static model, otherwise
> GPL for server and LGPL for applications. If someone wants to develop
> a non-free program, and link it statically, we still let them
Wow, I never thought of that possibility. One thought, though, is that it
might convolute things too much to #ifdef the licensing.
Regards,
Brad
