nanogui: Request for comments - Microwindows


Previous by date: 4 Oct 1999 18:57:31 -0000 Re: Request for comments - Microwindows, Bradley D. LaRonde
Next by date: 4 Oct 1999 18:57:31 -0000 Re: Request for comments - Microwindows, Alan Cox
Previous in thread: 4 Oct 1999 18:57:31 -0000 Re: Request for comments - Microwindows, Bradley D. LaRonde
Next in thread: 4 Oct 1999 18:57:31 -0000 Re: Request for comments - Microwindows, Alan Cox

Subject: Re: Request for comments - Microwindows
From: Alan Cox ####@####.####
Date: 4 Oct 1999 18:57:31 -0000
Message-Id: <E11YD9L-0007y9-00@the-village.bc.nu>

> 	So even though David Bell said "Permission is granted to use, distribute,
> or modify this source, provided that this copyright notice remain intact" we
> can say that now his code is subject to another agreement, the LGPL?
> Doesn't the LGPL restrict more than the above?

Yes. But that is allowed. 

You can take his work and use it as allowed by his license to create a
derivative work - his license allows this. What you cannot do is stop someone
taking David Bell's original work and using it under David Bell's license 
alone.

The derivative work (the combination) is differently licensed to the original
code he wrote.

> Also, can we have a GPL license on the server and an LGPL license
> on the applications?  Can we have both even if we allow linked-in
> apps and client/server apps?

It gets complicated in the linked in case.

Alan


Previous by date: 4 Oct 1999 18:57:31 -0000 Re: Request for comments - Microwindows, Bradley D. LaRonde
Next by date: 4 Oct 1999 18:57:31 -0000 Re: Request for comments - Microwindows, Alan Cox
Previous in thread: 4 Oct 1999 18:57:31 -0000 Re: Request for comments - Microwindows, Bradley D. LaRonde
Next in thread: 4 Oct 1999 18:57:31 -0000 Re: Request for comments - Microwindows, Alan Cox


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.