nanogui: Request for comments - Microwindows


Previous by date: 4 Oct 1999 19:07:40 -0000 Re: Request for comments - Microwindows, Vidar Hokstad
Next by date: 4 Oct 1999 19:07:40 -0000 Re: Request for comments - Microwindows, Vidar Hokstad
Previous in thread: 4 Oct 1999 19:07:40 -0000 Re: Request for comments - Microwindows, Vidar Hokstad
Next in thread: 4 Oct 1999 19:07:40 -0000 Re: Request for comments - Microwindows, Vidar Hokstad

Subject: RE: Request for comments - Microwindows
From: Greg Haerr ####@####.####
Date: 4 Oct 1999 19:07:40 -0000
Message-Id: <01BF0E68.CABC02D0.greg@censoft.com>

: Can you say what it is in *GPL that would make it unworkable for Screen
: Media?
: 
:: This is an idea, but why?  Doesn't MPL completely kill any GPL benefit?  Why
: would someone choose to use it under GPL when they can use it under MPL?
:
	I think it's clear that we can't go with just GPL.  So the issue
now is whether we should go with MPL or LGPL.  Both permit proprietary
code to be linked with the project.  Is there a significant benefit to MPL
that LGPL doesn't have?


Previous by date: 4 Oct 1999 19:07:40 -0000 Re: Request for comments - Microwindows, Vidar Hokstad
Next by date: 4 Oct 1999 19:07:40 -0000 Re: Request for comments - Microwindows, Vidar Hokstad
Previous in thread: 4 Oct 1999 19:07:40 -0000 Re: Request for comments - Microwindows, Vidar Hokstad
Next in thread: 4 Oct 1999 19:07:40 -0000 Re: Request for comments - Microwindows, Vidar Hokstad


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.