nanogui: Request for comments - Microwindows


Previous by date: 4 Oct 1999 19:08:11 -0000 Re: Request for comments - Microwindows, Greg Haerr
Next by date: 4 Oct 1999 19:08:11 -0000 Re: Request for comments - Microwindows, Vidar Hokstad
Previous in thread: 4 Oct 1999 19:08:11 -0000 Re: Request for comments - Microwindows, Greg Haerr
Next in thread: 4 Oct 1999 19:08:11 -0000 Re: Request for comments - Microwindows, Vidar Hokstad

Subject: Re: Request for comments - Microwindows
From: "Vidar Hokstad" ####@####.####
Date: 4 Oct 1999 19:08:11 -0000
Message-Id: <19991004190413.15986.qmail@mail.relight.com>

On Mon, 4 Oct 1999 19:49:11 +0100 (BST) you wrote:
>> I thought we'd already agreed on the MPL as a decent common denominator, 
>> but I'd have no problems with dual licensing the code under both *GPL 
>> and MPL. 
> 
>I still personally think the MPL is the only standard license that fits 
>the linked in case at all 

I agree, but on the other hand I'd gladly support licensing the code under
both the GPL and the MPL, so that those who wants to develop free software
can do so and still use other GPL'd software in their programs.

Regards,
Vidar

Previous by date: 4 Oct 1999 19:08:11 -0000 Re: Request for comments - Microwindows, Greg Haerr
Next by date: 4 Oct 1999 19:08:11 -0000 Re: Request for comments - Microwindows, Vidar Hokstad
Previous in thread: 4 Oct 1999 19:08:11 -0000 Re: Request for comments - Microwindows, Greg Haerr
Next in thread: 4 Oct 1999 19:08:11 -0000 Re: Request for comments - Microwindows, Vidar Hokstad


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.