nanogui: Re: running nano-x - SOLVED


Previous by date: 31 Jul 2004 17:29:52 +0100 Re: running nano-x - SOLVED, Hinko Kocevar
Next by date: 31 Jul 2004 17:29:52 +0100 Re: running nano-x, Greg Haerr
Previous in thread: 31 Jul 2004 17:29:52 +0100 Re: running nano-x - SOLVED, Hinko Kocevar
Next in thread: 31 Jul 2004 17:29:52 +0100 Re: running nano-x - SOLVED, Hinko Kocevar

Subject: Re: [nanogui] Re: running nano-x - SOLVED
From: "Greg Haerr" ####@####.####
Date: 31 Jul 2004 17:29:52 +0100
Message-Id: <0b6a01c4771c$5308ece0$6401a8c0@gregnewport>

> > hmm... it could be an ARM-specific issue.  I compile nano-X for my m68k
> > system with a 3.3.4 prerelease.

I knew it wasn't a problem with Microwindows select(), possibly
a bug with other drivers though...  After seeing this, I suspect
your problem is the default structure size differs between compilers,
and the structures passed to select() (timeout and fds) differ
in size from application compiler to kernel compiler.

Regards,

Greg


Previous by date: 31 Jul 2004 17:29:52 +0100 Re: running nano-x - SOLVED, Hinko Kocevar
Next by date: 31 Jul 2004 17:29:52 +0100 Re: running nano-x, Greg Haerr
Previous in thread: 31 Jul 2004 17:29:52 +0100 Re: running nano-x - SOLVED, Hinko Kocevar
Next in thread: 31 Jul 2004 17:29:52 +0100 Re: running nano-x - SOLVED, Hinko Kocevar


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.