nanogui: running nano-x


Previous by date: 31 Jul 2004 20:35:18 +0100 Re: running nano-x - SOLVED, Greg Haerr
Next by date: 31 Jul 2004 20:35:18 +0100 Re: Possible bug in GrSendClientData?, Greg Haerr
Previous in thread: 31 Jul 2004 20:35:18 +0100 Re: running nano-x, Hinko Kocevar
Next in thread: 31 Jul 2004 20:35:18 +0100 running nano-X, Demetris Zavorotnichenko

Subject: Re: [nanogui] running nano-x
From: "Greg Haerr" ####@####.####
Date: 31 Jul 2004 20:35:18 +0100
Message-Id: <0bda01c47736$432712b0$6401a8c0@gregnewport>

> I ran strace on nano-X and this line does not seem right:
> 
> select(4, [3], NULL, NULL, {3813670912, 3785383936}) = -1 EINVAL 
> (Invalid argument)
> 
> -> exceptfds and timeout are bogus !?
> 
> I belive it should read
> select(4, [3], NULL, NULL, NULL)

No, the last parameter is the timeout struct, which is
required for timing out of the select().  As I mentioned
in an earlier post, I'd bet the structure/size is different
between kernel and/or compiler versions.  Also, earlier
versions of ARM didn't default to 32-bit structure size
padding, like Intel (this caused my first Doom port to
iPAQ to fail, since Doom won't run without 32-bit
structure padding ala x86)

Regards,

Greg


Previous by date: 31 Jul 2004 20:35:18 +0100 Re: running nano-x - SOLVED, Greg Haerr
Next by date: 31 Jul 2004 20:35:18 +0100 Re: Possible bug in GrSendClientData?, Greg Haerr
Previous in thread: 31 Jul 2004 20:35:18 +0100 Re: running nano-x, Hinko Kocevar
Next in thread: 31 Jul 2004 20:35:18 +0100 running nano-X, Demetris Zavorotnichenko


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.