nanogui: Microwindows cleanups .... some ideas
Subject:
Re: [nanogui] Re: Microwindows cleanups .... some ideas
From:
alain volmat ####@####.####
Date:
27 Apr 2005 00:23:46 +0100
Message-Id: <20050426232318.10293.qmail@web41706.mail.yahoo.com>
> I know next to nothing about kconfig, but I'm
> opposed to it simply on
> the grounds that it places a dependency from
> microwin to KDE. I don't
> run KDE, and don't have kconfig on any of my
> machines. however,
> developer comfort really is an important issue and I
> realize that I'm
> likely in the minority, so wouldn't be completely
> heartbroken if it
> appears.
eh ?? KDE don't have anything to do here ..... as far
as I know the linux kernel doesn't need KDE to compile
:D I don't really know what makes you think that KDE
is needed, but if it is related to 'make .*config',
this is not an issue. You can take a look at busybox
or uclibc as an example.
Alain
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
