nanogui: Microwindows cleanups .... some ideas
Subject:
Re: [nanogui] Re: Microwindows cleanups .... some ideas
From:
"Aaron J. Grier" ####@####.####
Date:
27 Apr 2005 00:40:53 +0100
Message-Id: <20050426234024.GE1714@mordor.unix.fryenet>
On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 04:23:17PM -0700, alain volmat wrote:
> > I know next to nothing about kconfig, but I'm opposed to it simply
> > on the grounds that it places a dependency from microwin to KDE. I
> > don't run KDE, and don't have kconfig on any of my machines.
> > however, developer comfort really is an important issue and I
> > realize that I'm likely in the minority, so wouldn't be completely
> > heartbroken if it appears.
>
> eh ?? KDE don't have anything to do here ..... as far as I know the
> linux kernel doesn't need KDE to compile :D I don't really know what
> makes you think that KDE is needed, but if it is related to 'make
> .*config', this is not an issue. You can take a look at busybox or
> uclibc as an example.
one of the top hits on google for kconfig:
http://developer.kde.org/documentation/tutorials/kconfigxt/kconfigxt.html
I'm just a confused non-linux user.
what would "kconfig" do?
--
Aaron J. Grier | Frye Electronics, Tigard, OR | ####@####.####
