nanogui: #if FOO vs. #ifdef BAR
Subject:
Re: [nanogui] #if FOO vs. #ifdef BAR
From:
Alain Volmat ####@####.####
Date:
2 Jun 2005 14:33:55 +0100
Message-Id: <20050602133348.GA12841@pop.mail.yahoo.com>
The thing is that I'm not the guy who has permission of the CVS :D
One solution (some guys already mentioned that recently on the ML)
would be have a development tree. In a sense, this would be useful
since it is better to properly test modifications BEFORE commiting
them into the CVS (Greg insists on testing modifications with all
configurations of screen type for example ... well it makes sences).
The thing is that nanoX isn't a that big project and I'm not sure
that such tree (like the mm tree of the linux kernel) is really necessary.
Moreover it might even make maintenance work harder.
What's other guys opinion ?
Alain
* Alex Holden [Thu, 2 Jun 2005 at 09:30 +0100]
<quote>
> On 2 Jun 2005, at 01:08, Alain Volmat wrote:
> >The 0.92 work will I think start AFTER the 0.91 release since for now
> >no CVS commit is possible (because the CVS of 0.91 hasn't yet been
> >fixed).
>
> You could create a branch for the 0.91 release and start working on
> what will become 0.92 in the head.
>
> --
> ------------ Alex Holden - http://www.alexholden.net/ ------------
> If it doesn't work, you're not hitting it with a big enough hammer
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ####@####.####
> For additional commands, e-mail: ####@####.####
>
</quote>
_____________________________________________________________________________
Découvrez le nouveau Yahoo! Mail : 1 Go d'espace de stockage pour vos mails, photos et vidéos !
Créez votre Yahoo! Mail sur http://fr.mail.yahoo.com
