nanogui: #if FOO vs. #ifdef BAR
Subject:
Re: [nanogui] #if FOO vs. #ifdef BAR
From:
Alexander Neundorf ####@####.####
Date:
3 Jun 2005 20:54:13 +0100
Message-Id: <200506032153.57300.neundorf@kde.org>
Hi,
On Thursday 02 June 2005 15:33, Alain Volmat wrote:
> The thing is that I'm not the guy who has permission of the CVS :D
>
> One solution (some guys already mentioned that recently on the ML)
> would be have a development tree. In a sense, this would be useful
> since it is better to properly test modifications BEFORE commiting
> them into the CVS (Greg insists on testing modifications with all
> configurations of screen type for example ... well it makes sences).
>
> The thing is that nanoX isn't a that big project and I'm not sure
> that such tree (like the mm tree of the linux kernel) is really necessary.
> Moreover it might even make maintenance work harder.
>
> What's other guys opinion ?
IMO an experimental branch/tree would be a good idea. There stuff can be added
more easily and can be tested by more developers/users.
Bye
Alex
--
Work: ####@####.#### - http://www.jenoptik-los.de
Home: ####@####.#### - http://www.kde.org
####@####.#### - http://www.neundorf.net
