nanogui: Browser Porting/selection


Previous by date: 12 Oct 2005 00:50:16 +0100 Re: problem with config file settings & makefile, Greg Haerr
Next by date: 12 Oct 2005 00:50:16 +0100 Re: nano-X and kaffe: is it usable?, Greg Haerr
Previous in thread: 12 Oct 2005 00:50:16 +0100 Browser Porting/selection, amareesh
Next in thread:

Subject: Re: [nanogui] Browser Porting/selection
From: "Greg Haerr" ####@####.####
Date: 12 Oct 2005 00:50:16 +0100
Message-Id: <29a001c5cebc$79562770$0300a8c0@RDP>

: However , it is not clear if the ViewML free Version is having support
: for Plugins. , esp for CSS,MPlayer,Xpdf and Mail Client.

ViewML is based on an older KHTML client, v1.0.  There
is no plugin support.

: 
: Although low on footprint but still not very feature rich i guess.

Funny how that works with browsers!  Feature set is
exponentially dependent on code size, and even then
sometimes it doesn't work.


: Also , has anybody heard of DILLO and whether its  porting to nanoX is
: needed or available and is it feature rich??

I don't know dillo's features, but somebody contacted me
and stated they were interested in porting dillo. I haven't
heard much since, I think he was a core dillo team member.

Regards,

Greg


Previous by date: 12 Oct 2005 00:50:16 +0100 Re: problem with config file settings & makefile, Greg Haerr
Next by date: 12 Oct 2005 00:50:16 +0100 Re: nano-X and kaffe: is it usable?, Greg Haerr
Previous in thread: 12 Oct 2005 00:50:16 +0100 Browser Porting/selection, amareesh
Next in thread:


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.