nanogui: Re: [linuxce-devel] Re: Microwindows plans
Subject:
Re: [linuxce-devel] Re: Microwindows plans
From:
"Vidar Hokstad" ####@####.####
Date:
13 Oct 1999 07:52:31 -0000
Message-Id: <19991013074953.19170.qmail@mail.relight.com>
On Tue, 12 Oct 1999 19:36:20 -0400 you wrote:
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Alex Holden ####@####.####
>To: Ben Pfaff ####@####.####
>Cc: ####@####.####
>Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 1999 4:06 PM
>Subject: Re: [linuxce-devel] Re: Microwindows plans
>
>
>> On 11 Oct 1999, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>> > As I stated before, I'm willing to relicense BOGL. Is MPL with
>> > convert-to-GPL the license that NanoGUI is definitely under now? If
>>
>> Yes.
>
>Does that mean that we can freely mix in GPL-only code into the project, or
>do we need dual for that?
That depends on what you mean by "freely mix".
You can freely include GPL only code in your tree, yes.
On the other hand, I hope that we take care only to include dual licensed
code in the main distribution.... Or at the very least _clearly_ separate
any GPL'd parts from the rest.
Regards,
Vidar
