plustek: Bearpaw 1200CU


Previous by date: 7 May 2002 06:04:23 -0000 Bearpaw 1200CU, James Bunton
Next by date: 7 May 2002 06:04:23 -0000 Re: OpticPro600P overscans, Jaeger, Gerhard
Previous in thread: 7 May 2002 06:04:23 -0000 Bearpaw 1200CU, James Bunton
Next in thread: 7 May 2002 06:04:23 -0000 Re: Bearpaw 1200CU, James Bunton

Subject: Re: Bearpaw 1200CU
From: "Jaeger, Gerhard" <gerhard@ruebennase>
Date: 7 May 2002 06:04:23 -0000
Message-Id: <174xwO-0NDFyqC@fmrl11.sul.t-online.com>

Hi James,

try Henning Meier-Geinitz' page at
http://www.meier-geinitz.de/sane/scanners.html

I think the Mustek Backend supports this scanner. The Plustek
backend supports only the Bearpaw 1200/2400 (without CU)

Gerhard

On Saturday, 4. May 2002 14:28, James Bunton wrote:
> Hi peoples..
>
> I've recently purchased a scanner. A Mustek Bearpaw 1200CU.
> Looking quickly through the archives there doesn't seem to be anything
> about this particular scanner, except somebody wanting to purchase one.
>
> The scanner has a device ID of 0x5d8 or 0x05d8, I'm not sure if they're the
> same...
> And a product ID of 0x4002.
>
> I can't get scanner.o to recognise the scanner. I've tried modprobe with
> the options "vendor=0x5d8 product=0x4002" and "vendor=0x05d8
> product=0x4002". I've also tried just plain insmoding it.
>
> The scanner always shows up as not being used by any driver..
> Also, each time I run sane-find-scanner it increments the number of "uses"
> of scanner.o. There seems to be no way to bring this down to zero again, so
> I cannot rmmod scanner and have to reboot to change the options.
>
> Any help with this will be much appreciated.
>
>
> Thanks

Previous by date: 7 May 2002 06:04:23 -0000 Bearpaw 1200CU, James Bunton
Next by date: 7 May 2002 06:04:23 -0000 Re: OpticPro600P overscans, Jaeger, Gerhard
Previous in thread: 7 May 2002 06:04:23 -0000 Bearpaw 1200CU, James Bunton
Next in thread: 7 May 2002 06:04:23 -0000 Re: Bearpaw 1200CU, James Bunton


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.