primax: Colorado 1200p semi-success report ;-)


Previous by date: 27 May 2000 14:56:50 -0000 Primax colorado 600p (parallel port), Dousak May (Phoebus Apollonus)
Next by date: 27 May 2000 14:56:50 -0000 Re: Colorado 600P/1200P: anybody has it working? Yes, with pxscan-0.2, Christian Ordig
Previous in thread: 27 May 2000 14:56:50 -0000 Colorado 1200p semi-success report ;-), J. Fernando Moyano
Next in thread:

Subject: Re: Colorado 1200p semi-success report ;-)
From: Christian Ordig ####@####.####
Date: 27 May 2000 14:56:50 -0000
Message-Id: <20000527164950.E491@thor.chris.com>

On Sat, May 27, 2000 at 11:42:15AM +0200, J. Fernando Moyano wrote:
> 
> I have got a Colorado 1200p scanner. I downloaded the driver from Gustaf
> Kroling and ... surprise !!! It seem to work.... or no ???
it won't fully work, since the 1200p has another resolution.
 
> When i tried the -lon and -loff options, i observed that my scanner returns a
> different id (0x06) to the spected (0x05). I added a line to pxscan.c
strange... I got the 0x05 with mine.
May we have the partnumbers of your scanner please? You can also compare them
to the partnumbers of the 1200p mentioned in our table on our homepage.

-- 
Christian Ordig             | Homepage: http://thor.prohosting.com/~chrordig/ 
Germany                     |    eMail: Christian Ordig ####@####.####

[Content type application/pgp-signature not shown. Download]

Previous by date: 27 May 2000 14:56:50 -0000 Primax colorado 600p (parallel port), Dousak May (Phoebus Apollonus)
Next by date: 27 May 2000 14:56:50 -0000 Re: Colorado 600P/1200P: anybody has it working? Yes, with pxscan-0.2, Christian Ordig
Previous in thread: 27 May 2000 14:56:50 -0000 Colorado 1200p semi-success report ;-), J. Fernando Moyano
Next in thread:


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.