primax: Re: Colorado 600P/1200P: anybody has it working? Yes, with pxscan-0.2


Previous by date: 27 May 2000 14:56:58 -0000 Re: Colorado 1200p semi-success report ;-), Christian Ordig
Next by date: 27 May 2000 14:56:58 -0000 Re: pxscan-0.2, Christian Ordig
Previous in thread: 27 May 2000 14:56:58 -0000 Re: Colorado 600P/1200P: anybody has it working? Yes, with pxscan-0.2, Michael Seiwert
Next in thread: 27 May 2000 14:56:58 -0000 Re: Colorado 600P/1200P: anybody has it working? Yes, with pxscan-0.2, Milan Zimmermann

Subject: Re: Colorado 600P/1200P: anybody has it working? Yes, with pxscan-0.2
From: Christian Ordig ####@####.####
Date: 27 May 2000 14:56:58 -0000
Message-Id: <20000527164252.D491@thor.chris.com>

On Sat, May 27, 2000 at 02:31:00PM +0000, Michael Seiwert wrote:
> Hi Milan,
> 
> yes, it would be a good idea to check the harware numbers, if you could do
> that ???
> 
> I will to check my hardware numbers, what do I have to check ?? The IC's ??
simply look up the partnumbers-table on our project's page... and you'll
know what to check...

cu.

-- 
Christian Ordig             | Homepage: http://thor.prohosting.com/~chrordig/ 
Germany                     |    eMail: Christian Ordig ####@####.####

[Content type application/pgp-signature not shown. Download]

Previous by date: 27 May 2000 14:56:58 -0000 Re: Colorado 1200p semi-success report ;-), Christian Ordig
Next by date: 27 May 2000 14:56:58 -0000 Re: pxscan-0.2, Christian Ordig
Previous in thread: 27 May 2000 14:56:58 -0000 Re: Colorado 600P/1200P: anybody has it working? Yes, with pxscan-0.2, Michael Seiwert
Next in thread: 27 May 2000 14:56:58 -0000 Re: Colorado 600P/1200P: anybody has it working? Yes, with pxscan-0.2, Milan Zimmermann


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.