nanogui: Status?
Subject:
Re: Status?
From:
Vidar Hokstad ####@####.####
Date:
6 Sep 1999 11:02:05 -0000
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.10.9909061248450.15027-100000@a.ncg.net>
On Mon, 6 Sep 1999, Alex Holden wrote:
> The original network code was wrong from the outset, what it should have
> done instead of a command response, was to package up the request and
> stick it in a queue, which should be forwarded to the server in one block
> whenever a function is executed which requires a result to be returned. I
> started doing this, and I think the code I did is in the CVS.
Great... I have been seriously considering doing the same, but I didn't
want to mess with it until I'd checked on the status.
> My preference is for people to use the CVS tree on linuxhacker.org. If
> anyone else wants write access, just let me know.
Ok.. I'l take a look at the CVS version :)
> Cool. You're not the first person to say that they are seriously
> considering allocating a developer to work full time on Nano-X either :)
> I'd really like to see Nano-X take off, I just don't have any free time to
> work on it. Linuxhacker.org is of course always at your disposal for
> mailing list, web, ftp, cvs, etc. services...
We *need* a small GUI, and currently that's NanoX, so we'll have to make
sure it works at least well enough for our purpose... :-)
Now the only delay for us is actually finding the right person.. So if
anyone in Oslo, Norway is following this list, they should mail me ASAP
for a new cool Linux related job :) (we will consider people who will work
remotely too, but it's easiest for us to deal with someone here).
Regards,
Vidar Hokstad ####@####.####
Director of Technical Development, Screen Media AS
