primax: Re: Colorado 600P/1200P: anybody has it working? Yes, with pxscan-0.2


Previous by date: 29 May 2000 18:29:07 -0000 A number of things re pxscan, Gustaf Kroling
Next by date: 29 May 2000 18:29:07 -0000 Re: A number of things re pxscan, Christian Ordig
Previous in thread: 29 May 2000 18:29:07 -0000 Re: Colorado 600P/1200P: anybody has it working? Yes, with pxscan-0.2, Christian Ordig
Next in thread:

Subject: Re: Colorado 600P/1200P: anybody has it working? Yes, with pxscan-0.2
From: Milan Zimmermann ####@####.####
Date: 29 May 2000 18:29:07 -0000
Message-Id: <3932A8B7.DFE2CBE1@worldchat.com>

Michael,

I will open the box tonight. I am not really sure I have 32bit or 36bit
or something else - it does not seem to be specified on the box or in
the docs. One thing, you may want to make sure you have the port
switched to "pure" EPP 1.9 - that is what I have, but cannot test if
SPP/EPP make a difference, my MB only supports SPP and "pure" EPP 1.7 or
EPP1.9 

Milan

Michael Seiwert wrote:
> 
> Hi Milan,
> 
> yes, it would be a good idea to check the harware numbers, if you could do
> that ???
> 
> I will to check my hardware numbers, what do I have to check ?? The IC's ??
> 
> Is it the 36bit model of the D600 Colorado ???
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Michael
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ####@####.####
> For additional commands, e-mail: ####@####.####

Previous by date: 29 May 2000 18:29:07 -0000 A number of things re pxscan, Gustaf Kroling
Next by date: 29 May 2000 18:29:07 -0000 Re: A number of things re pxscan, Christian Ordig
Previous in thread: 29 May 2000 18:29:07 -0000 Re: Colorado 600P/1200P: anybody has it working? Yes, with pxscan-0.2, Christian Ordig
Next in thread:


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.