primax: A number of things re pxscan


Previous by date: 29 May 2000 18:50:32 -0000 Re: Colorado 600P/1200P: anybody has it working? Yes, with pxscan-0.2, Milan Zimmermann
Next by date: 29 May 2000 18:50:32 -0000 Re: LZW compression, Christian Ordig
Previous in thread: 29 May 2000 18:50:32 -0000 A number of things re pxscan, Gustaf Kroling
Next in thread:

Subject: Re: A number of things re pxscan
From: Christian Ordig ####@####.####
Date: 29 May 2000 18:50:32 -0000
Message-Id: <20000529171234.C529@thor.chris.com>

On Sun, May 28, 2000 at 09:24:20PM +0200, Gustaf Kroling wrote:
> I see that I have missed saturdays mails. Thanks Christian
> for your
> answers :-)
no problem ... I also missed one week of mail... I had to go into the forrest
and do some shooting exercises ... ;-) 
 
> Re: D9600 ASIC E1
> 
> This asic is not supported for the simple reason that I have
> no such
> scanner. 
I've never seen a D9600 with E1 in real life, has anyone?

> *But* I happend to find one that I can borrow from
> time to
> time.
Is there any need for E1 support?

> If someone sends me info on that scanner maybe it is
> possible
> to integrate it into the same driver or at least in a common
> source-
> code. 
I've specs for the E1... there shouldn't be that much differences... but some
strange things have changed. e.g. the E1 only supports one button, so it
doesn't have an extra register for that purpose. it's just a bit in the
register which controls the lamp. The lamp isn't switched using Bit7 but using
Bit0 ... some other differences may exist, but I only know the E3 from the
sources by Gustaf Kroling.

> Re: 600P / 1200P
> 
> Can't Primax supply us with a list of what they have
> produced this far?
> It seems as if a Primax scanner can contain almost anything.
I claim Primax even doesn't know it itself... ;-)
The told me which Primax Colorado Direct and other OEM models exist, but they
didn't tell me any model...
 
> The label
> on the package seems to be irrelevant. Anyway, as long as
> they use the
> E3 ( and possibly E1 ) ASIC it should be a matter of
> parameters to make
> it work I think. 
Yes... and this can be queried using register 0x00 ...

> But again I have no such scanners at hand.
Marco and me have the 1200p, D9600 the 19200 USB and the Colorado  

> Re: Patches
> 
> pxscan is almost rewritten by now. It can do black&white and
> gray scans
> among other things. However, it is not stable and more
> things have to be
> cleaned up. This means that sending me patches may be a good
> way to show
> how things can be done but don't do more than needed to make
> it work. I will
> probably not be able to use the patches 'as are' by now.
I'd suggest again setting up a CVS server ... so all the guys knowing what
they do are able to do it. It'll be better than sending patches against a
version you don't have anymore. If you have any problems setting up this
service or don't really understand what CVS really does I'd be glad to help.

> Re: Myself
> 
> I will be absorbed by another bold project during June and
> can't work on 
> pxscan nor will I read any mails. In July most things come
> to a standstill
> here so expect to here from me again by then :-)
that's another reason for setting up a CVS.
 
-- 
Christian Ordig             | Homepage: http://thor.prohosting.com/~chrordig/ 
Germany                     |    eMail: Christian Ordig ####@####.####

[Content type application/pgp-signature not shown. Download]

Previous by date: 29 May 2000 18:50:32 -0000 Re: Colorado 600P/1200P: anybody has it working? Yes, with pxscan-0.2, Milan Zimmermann
Next by date: 29 May 2000 18:50:32 -0000 Re: LZW compression, Christian Ordig
Previous in thread: 29 May 2000 18:50:32 -0000 A number of things re pxscan, Gustaf Kroling
Next in thread:


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.